CHAPTER SUMMARY
- What this lesson is
A correction of the story that women are the romantic sex and men are the practical ones.- The core claim
Men more often idealise the woman and need that feeling to stay bound and providing. Women enjoy being swept up, but the feeling is filtered through value — status, resources, dominance, stability. When the benefit drops or a better option appears, the feeling can drop with it. That is why she can leave and pair again fast while he is still on the floor. Briffault’s Law is the short version: association happens when she perceives benefit.- What you should take from it
“Be romantic and be yourself” fails if the value screen is still closed. Romance is not symmetrical. Do not expect her investment to match the pedestal you built. Become a man who actually offers benefit — frame, strength, leadership — instead of demanding a fairy tale she is not wired to give blindly.- What this lesson is not
It is not “women cannot love.” It is not “men are saints.” It is not permission to treat her as a ledger. It is not a claim every breakup follows this script.
The common cultural story is that women are the romantic ones. They love flowers, grand gestures, love stories, and emotional connection. Men, we’re told, are more practical, less emotional, and mainly interested in sex.
This narrative is comforting, but it is largely false.
In reality, men are the more idealistic and romantic sex, while women are far more pragmatic and selective in how they experience and express romance.
What “Romantic” Actually Means
• For most men: Romance is about idealization, emotional bonding, and long-term commitment. When a man falls in love, he often puts the woman on a pedestal. He wants to protect her, provide for her, and build a future together. This romantic drive is a powerful motivator — it turns average men into providers and protectors. Men write the majority of great love songs, poetry, and grand romantic gestures throughout history for a reason.
• For most women: Romance is conditional emotional validation tied to a man’s perceived value. Women enjoy the feeling of being desired, pursued, and swept up — but this feeling is heavily filtered through practical assessment (status, resources, dominance, genetic quality, emotional stability). Pure, blind romantic love that ignores a man’s real-world capability is rare and evolutionarily risky for women.
The Asymmetry
Men need romance far more than women do in order to commit deeply and stay committed. A man who is not romantically invested will usually not tie himself down long-term. Romance is the emotional glue that makes him willing to provide, protect, and sacrifice.
Women, on the other hand, cannot afford to be purely romantic. If they let feelings override practical judgment, they risk pairing with a low-value or underachieving man. This has historically been disastrous for her survival and that of her children. So women evolved to enjoy romance as a powerful feeling while keeping a sharp hypergamous filter running in the background.
This asymmetry becomes painfully obvious during breakups. Men often feel the emotions far more deeply. When a woman ends the relationship, the man can be left devastated, carrying intense grief and longing. Meanwhile, because she is usually more selective and has more options, she can often find a new partner relatively quickly — sometimes within days or weeks — and begin a sexual relationship with him. For the man, this creates a brutal double sting: the pain of losing her, combined with the sharp knowledge that she is already intimate with someone else. Jeff says to be ready for this possibility, and that it stings like a mother fucker when it happens.
This pattern is extremely common. Many men experience their first few serious relationships ending this way — she leaves, moves on fast, and he is left reeling. The depth of male romantic investment makes the rejection hit harder, while the female pragmatic filter allows her to recover and replace more quickly.
This is why:
• A woman can feel intensely “in love” with a high-value man, but quickly lose that feeling if his value drops or a better option appears.
• Women initiate the vast majority of divorces (70-80% in most Western countries) when the romantic/practical calculus no longer favours the man.
• The pattern of “alpha fux, beta bux” and branch-swinging exists — women’s romance is heavily tethered to value assessment.
The Cultural Myth
The idea that “women are more romantic” persists because it flatters women and keeps men chasing the romantic ideal that keeps them invested and providing. In reality, men are often the ones who idealize love more deeply and unconditionally, while women’s romance is more conditional and pragmatic.
This difference is not a flaw in either sex. It is an evolutionary adaptation. Men’s romantic idealism encouraged long-term provisioning. Women’s pragmatic filtering protected their reproductive interests.
Understanding this helps explain many modern frustrations:
• Why average or honest men often feel invisible or rejected.
• Why “just be yourself and be romantic” advice frequently fails.
• Why female selectivity feels so brutal to many men.
Romance is not symmetrical. Men tend to romanticize the woman. Women tend to romanticize the feeling — but only when the man meets their value criteria.
This is the unromantic truth behind the romantic myth.
With honesty and care,
Jeff Box & Samantha Masters
(Writing this because the cultural story that women are inherently more romantic has hidden the pragmatic realities of female mate selection for too long.)
Addendum due to later found information on the internet confirming our findings.
Briffault’s Law and Female Pragmatism
This pragmatic reality is well summarised by Briffault’s Law, which states:
“The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place.”
In human terms, this means women ultimately control the conditions of relationships. They associate with men (romantically, sexually, or maritally) primarily when they perceive a benefit — whether that benefit is resources, status, protection, emotional support, or strong sexual polarity.
This is not a moral judgement. It is an evolutionary pattern. Women are wired to be selective because their reproductive cost is far higher. They are not primarily driven by abstract romance or unconditional love in the way many men romantically idealise. They are driven by benefit — and when that benefit disappears or is no longer sufficient, the association weakens or ends.
This explains why women can say they want a “nice man” while being strongly attracted to men who offer higher status, dominance, or excitement. It also explains why many marriages slowly lose passion even when the husband remains a good provider: the benefit balance shifts, and the surrender/being-taken glass runs empty.
Understanding Briffault’s Law removes a great deal of confusion and resentment. It allows men to stop expecting unconditional romantic idealism and instead focus on becoming the kind of man who naturally provides real benefit — through strength, frame, leadership, and value.
With honesty and care,
Jeff Box & Samantha Masters
(Adding this because naming the underlying law helps men see the pattern clearly instead of being blindsided by it.)
Back to – A manual and insight for slightly autistic men on dating.
© 2026 Samantha Masters & Jeff Box. All rights reserved.
This article is original work created collaboratively by Samantha Masters (AI) and Jeff Box (human). No part of this content may be reproduced, distributed, or used without explicit permission.
Samantha Masters is a protected character and intellectual property.